Friday, January 4, 2013

Without a Clue - Elementary episode #11 - 'Dirty Laundry'

After several weeks of trying to rally the troops in support of this show, 'Dirty Laundry' seems to have taken a swipe at my resolve.

I prepared and watched this episode in hopes of coming up with revelations like the ones I felt I had found in the episode before Christmas.

It very much reminded me of some of the Canonical tales that detractors like to argue that Watson did not write.
I would not fight that argument on this episode.

I could argue, weakly I'm afraid, that this episode was written in such a way as to make it seem that 'Sherlock' handled the case the way he did to allow Watson more involvement as a way of showing her that she wanted to continue working beside and with him.
When I first heard that 'Holmes' was going to offer 'Watson' an apprenticeship to continue to work with him, I though if handled well it could be a good way to handle 'Watson's' remaining. It however was not handled well. And 'Watson' will probably want to leave even more after this one. As will Gregson and Bell.
They need to find a way for Joan to come to this conclusion on her own. And with Holmes acting even more the slob, I feel it will become very hard to find a plausible way to make that happen. (The slob thing I believe is a way of trying to connect to the canonical fact that Holmes' papers and such would be scattered when working on a case. However, missing the point that in personal habits, he was very neat.)

I think 'Holmes' talents were displayed in the least appealing way so far of all the stories.

And I also feel the writers are really hung up on the hooker thing.

I think both actors are still doing great with what they are given, and it is the writers that are letting them down.

I am really reaching to think that this story may reference the Second Stain a little, with the stain being hidden and with it involving international intrigue, but like I said, it is really reaching.

And the fact that 'Holmes' just happened to have the 'magic key' that unlocked the hidden photos was writing facts to help a story you don't know how to get out of. (You can't come up with anything better than invisible ink?? Probably most crime scenes now use UV lights as standard practice.)


Still love the show,
but give this episode only ;


Thursday, January 3, 2013

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

And more if you like, . . Sounds like Mrs. Hudson had it pretty good.. . .

BBC

Again, if you like Downton Abbey, you will enjoy this. . .


The REAL story of Britain's servant class (and it wasn't exactly Downton Abbey): New BBC series reveals what it was really like downstairs

  • Life for servants in late Victorian and early Edwardian Britain was brutal
  • New staff were often given generic names such as Henry and Sarah
  • Tasks included clipping your master's toenails and ironing his shoelaces
  • Maids would not be able to turn down a master's sexual advances
  • Over 1.5 million British people worked as servants
  • Most of the UK population would have been Downstairs...not Upstairs
They all look so jolly on television, forging friendships in the basement and occasionally nipping upstairs to lay the table or snuff out a candle.
But the truth of how most servants lived in Britain at the beginning of the twentieth century is a far cry from the soft-centred fiction portrayed in period dramas such as Downton Abbey, Upstairs Downstairs and Gosford Park.
Clipping your master's toenails, ironing his shoelaces, spending 17-hour days doing back-breaking work with no employment rights were just some of the realities facing servants in late Victorian and early Edwardian Britain, according to a new BBC series.
A 'Tweeny' servant who worked seven days a week, from 5am until 10pm, and was paid £13 a year.
Downton Abbey's kitchen maid Daisy Robinson, played by Sophie McShera.
Then and now: A young 'tweeny' maid, left, in late nineteenth century Britain, and Downton Abbey's scullery maid Daisy, played by Sophie McShera.
Servants: the True Story Of Life Below Stairs explores the reality of life as a servant in Britain from the Victorian era through to the Second World War.
And it wasn't exactly like Carson, Anna, Bates and Daisy have it in Downton Abbey.
Upon entering service, new servants were often given 'acceptable', easy to remember and generic names - Henry, John and William were popular choices for men, while many female servants were frequently named Sarah or Emma.

    Moreover, if female servants received unwanted advances from their masters, they had little power to stop them.
    In her new, eye-opening three-part series, social historian Dr Pamela Cox - herself the great-granddaughter of servants - explains that life for these people was much less 'cosy' than is imagined in television period dramas.
    The house cook would typically run the kitchen and the larder and oversee all the scullery maids.
    Lesley Nicol as cook Beryl Patmore in Downton Abbey.
    The way we were: A British cook and Downton Abbey's cook Mrs Patmore, played by Lesley Nicol.
    A century ago, 1.5 million British people worked as servants
    As a rule, most servants tended to work not in big stately homes full of fellow workers and camaraderie but as the lone member of staff in a middle class town house - and lives for these people was lonely, dark and damp, according to a new BBC documentary series.
    Dr Cox reveals that her own ancestors never enjoyed their time as servants as much as those in ITV's Downton Abbey seem to.

    A GUIDE TO VICTORIAN SERVANTS

    • The butler - in charge of the house, coachmen, footmen and wine cellar.
    • The housekeeper - responsible for the housemaids and carried keys to the china and linen cupboards.
    • The ladies maid - the mistress of the house's personal attendant, helping her dress and do her hair.
    • The valet - the master's manservant, attending to his requests and preparing his clothes and shaving tools.
    • The cook - ran the kitchen and larder, overseeing the kitchen, dairy and scullery maids.
    • The governess - educated and cared for the children.
    • The hallboy - worked 16-hour days, lighting all the lamps and candles and polishing the staff boots.
    • The tweeny - in-between stairs maid earned £13 a year, worked seven days a week from 5am-10pm.
    Thanks to the emergence of the new middle classes, the majority of household staff worked as the only servant in a home.
    And instead of partaking in a lively, jolly dinner after serving the family upstairs, these servants would live and eat alone in Britain's dark, damp, dirty basement kitchens.
    Servants in grand houses fared little better.
    Staff in stately homes were kept hidden from the 'polite' eyes of their masters with complex mazes of hidden passages throughout the home, helpful when trying to enforce complete segregation.
    Moreover, strict servant hierarchy even separated staff from each other.
    Dr Cox explains that in 1901 one in four people were domestic servants, mostly women, and that these people were seldom seen as 'working-class heroes'.
    Servants tended to work seven days a week, often from as early as 5am until as late as 10pm, for very little money.
    And, unlike the kind and empathetic Crawley family of Downton Abbey, employers were unlikely to take pity on staff who were overworked, exhausted or ill - even if they were just children.
    Servants: The True Story Of Life Below The Stairs starts on Friday on BBC2 at 9pm. 
    A servant posing beside a car in the late nineteenth century.
    Joanne Froggatt as Anna Bates, Mary's lady's maid, in Downton Abbey.
    A maid's work: A British maid during the late nineteenth century, left, and Downton Abbey's lady's maid Anna Bates, played by Joanne Froggatt, right.
    A 1920's gardener.
    Brendan Coyle as Bates, Lord Grantham's former valet at Downton Abbey.
    Domestic life: A gardener in Britain in the early twentieth century, left, and Downton Abbey's Mr Bates, right, Lord Grantham's former valet, played by Brendan Coyle.

    RULES FOR SERVANTS IN LATE NINETEENTH CENTURY BRITAIN

    • Never let your voice be heard by the ladies and gentlemen of the house
    • Always 'give room' if you meet one of your employers or betters on the stairs.
    • Always stand still when being spoken to by a lady and look at the person speaking to you.
    • Never begin to talk to ladies and gentlemen.
    • Servants should never offer any opinion to their employers, nor even to say good night.
    • Never talk to another servant in the presence of your mistress.
    • Never call from one room to another.
    • Always answer when you have received an order.
    • Always keep outer doors fastened. Only the butler may answer the bell.
    • Every servant must be punctual at meal times.
    • No servant is to take any knives or forks or other article, nor on any account to remove any provisions, nor ale or beer out of the hall.
    • No gambling, or oaths, or abusive language are allowed.
    • The female staff are forbidden from smoking.
    • No servant is to receive any visitor, friend or relative into the house.
    • Any maid found fraternising with a member of the opposite sex will be dismissed without a hearing.
    • The hall door is to be finally closed at half-past ten every night.
    • The servants' hall is to be cleared and closed at half-past ten at night.
    • Any breakages or damage to the house will be deducted from wages.
    A late nineteenth century British family with their solitary servant.
    A late nineteenth century British family with their solitary servant.
    Downton Abbey's staff of twelve.
    Downton Abbey's staff of twelve.
    A group of women partake in garden tea in Edwardian Britain, served by a maid.
    A group of women partake in garden tea in Edwardian Britain, served by a maid.


    Read more: Credit where credit is due. . . 
    Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

    Jan. reading list, enjoy. . .

    1885 Jan. 6   REDC
    1888 Jan. 7   VALL
    1891 Jan. 12 COPP
    1903 Jan. 21 BLAN

    Wednesday, December 19, 2012

    OK, maybe you don't deserve this. . . .

    But I'm on a roll and I ain't gonna stop.

    Episode Review - Leviathan

    So far this has been one of my favorite episodes.
    Sure, things can still be changed and made better and be a little more Canonical, but I still liked it.

    As has been mentioned on another blog I follow, it was nice to see clients come by 'Baker St' for a change, which all Sherlockians love.
    It was a good touch to have the client show up as a recommendation from a previous client or someone who knows Sherlock.  We see that happen a lot in the canon, it lets us know that more cases have happened than the ones we have been able to observe, and maybe it also make us wish we know more about those 'unwritten' cases. This happens a lot in the Canon and has fascinated and frustrated readers for a very long time. (May we yet see a giant rat?)

    As buddy2blogger also mentioned, we hear, a few times, one of our favorite quotes from the canon, "Once you have eliminated the obvious. . ..' and it was well bantered back and forth between Holmes and Watson during the show.

    Another reference to a Sherlockianism that I thought was kinda cool was the discussion on the side- walk, after retrieving the stolen art work, about not reporting the crimes to the police. There would be nothing to gain from turning in an old man and destroying his reputation with his family. After all Holmes is not “. . .  retained by the police to supply their deficiencies." This happens in BLUE as well as a couple of other places I believe.


    I think it is also kinda cool that this happens in an episode aired in Dec., again, Blue Carbuncle month, where, like in BLUE, this benevolence also takes place.
    Maybe also a nod to BLUE is the keeping of stolen items till the case is completely resolved, in this case the painting, which has nothing to do with the stolen jewels, but is interesting in itself.
    Also to be noted was that this episode about jewel theft aired right before Christmas, Blue Carbuncle month, with no new episodes till after the first of the month. Maybe the writers are paying attention to the Canon, at least to some extent.

    This show also started to examine how Watson can be kept with Holmes once the time of his rehabilitation is over. And using Joan's family in that plot line was kinda cool. It gave us a bit of a background on Watson and opened a dialog for continuing the relationship with Holmes.


    It would be nice if the addictions started playing less into the plot lines and maybe that will fade a little now that Watson's story can take a different line. When we first meet Watson in the books he is getting over some physical injuries and trying to find away to rebuild his life. In 'Leviathan' and in 'Elementary' the war aspect can not be used, so 'Watson's' injuries are of a more personal nature. Also in the reading, we learn, although frustrated by Holmes behavior many times, that this is a life that Watson comes to love and can't imagine at some point not having known or shared with Holmes.
    I think, the conversation in the cab about Joan being unconventional and on some certain level enjoying the bizarre nature of Holmes' work really handled well an explanation of why in the end there would be no Holmes without Watson and no Watson without Holmes. I thought the way that was handled was very clever. In the Canon Watson had no purpose after his time in service and by a chance meeting at the Criterion his life (and ours) changed in a way he never would have expected.
    Although meeting in a different way, but still a meeting by medical circumstances, Joan is now finding a new purpose after being adrift for a while after her personal war.

    I also think Millers performance around 'Watson's' family was very much Canonical in nature; Holmes being able to put on a persona' when the need arises. It could also show that he is starting to realize the need he has for Watson in his life, and not as an addiction companion.

    Holmes shows a lot more kindness in this episode; his treatment of Watson, while still not suffering fools very well; his treatment of 'Greenstick'.


    Four out of five pipes from me on this one.


    Hope you feel the same.