As I mentioned yesterday, this weeks episode of Timeless was called 'Mrs. Sherlock Holmes'.
And since the show likes to blend fact with fiction I was not expecting the show to have come up with another fictional character to add to its leads.
Instead this episode focused on the abilities of Mary Grace Humiston.
An early 20th century woman who made her name known as a lawyer and part time detective.
While we will never know if Ms. Humistons personality was indeed Sherlockian, they played that for all it was worth in the episode.
Enough so that you could see a show built around 'Mrs. Sherlock Holmes' and the very Sherlockian way she was played.
Well done.
One thing I like about shows the blend fact in fiction is that they make me want to go find out how much of the fact is actually fact and how much is fiction.
Showing posts with label History. Show all posts
Showing posts with label History. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 1, 2018
Tuesday, December 12, 2017
Did you have dinner or supper?
“Then I suggest that we turn our dinner into a supper and follow up this clue while it is still hot.” Sherlock Holmes.
Although we now use the words dinner and supper interchangeably to mean the same thing, our largest meal of the day. It has not always been as such.
Well, at least in certain cultures.
Most of us have grown up in a society that now runs on three meals a day; breakfast, lunch and dinner.
At least that is the way my family has always done it.
Breakfast, usually oatmeal or cereal (with bacon and eggs on weekends).
Lunch, what ever mom packed for school or the lunch ladies cooked.
And dinner, when dad got home from work, and our biggest meal of the day.
I don't remember us ever having a distinction between the use of the words dinner or supper, although I seem to have been called to more 'dinner times' than 'supper times'.
For much of the English speaking world dinner is the biggest meal of the day, usually taken sometime between noon and early evening.
Even the now traditional Sunday Roast is sometimes called Sunday Dinner or Roast Dinner.
In the USA we usually eat our Thanksgiving or Christmas meals early in the afternoon and they are usually referred to as Thanksgiving Dinner or Christmas Dinner.
And supper would be a lighter meal taken later in the evening. The etymology of supper is usually seen to come from some form of soup. Which would suggest a light meal.
For much of it's modern history the time of 'dinner' seemed to keep getting pushed back, until what had been a meal taken at two or three in the afternoon, to now easily taking place much later, at say six or seven. One survey by an Australian winemaker found that the average time in the UK for the evening meal is now about 7:47 pm.
Throw into the mix 'Tea Time' and what time that could take place, and what is served with 'Tea Time' and it can get real confusing.
Where I have always assumed 'Tea Time' was at 4pm, source suggest it can also be taken some time between 5 and 7.
It is associated with the working class and is typically eaten between 5 pm and 7 pm. In the North of England, North and South Wales, the English Midlands, Scotland and in rural and working class areas of Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, people traditionally call their midday meal dinner and their evening meal tea(served around 6 pm), whereas the upper social classes would call the midday meal lunch or luncheon and the evening meal (served after 7 pm) dinner (if formal) or supper (if informal). Source
So, with all that said, there doesn't seem to be any firm set rules of when you call what, it just depends on where you grow up.
With that said; what prompted this inquiry was when Sherlock Holmes says, “Very glad to see you. I dine at seven. There is a woodcock, I believe. By the way, in view of recent occurrences, perhaps I ought to ask Mrs. Hudson to examine its crop.”
And then a few minutes later Holmes and Watson have the following exchange; “It is quite certain that he knows nothing whatever about the matter. Are you hungry, Watson?”
“Not particularly.”
“Then I suggest that we turn our dinner into a supper and follow up this clue while it is still hot.'
This suggests that, one; dinner was going to be Holmes big meal of the day. Two; it was going to be rather late, seven. And three; super would be a very late, a much lighter meal (maybe cold woodcock sandwiches?).
We must also remember that this habit of assigning times to meals can also be considered an industrial age habit and mostly, as suggested, a middle and upper class tradition. Poor countries and rural workers were more likely to take the meals when time and abundance allowed.
These are the Canonical discussion that made me wonder how we use the words dinner and supper.
BLUE ends with Holmes saying to Watson, "If you will have the goodness to touch the bell, Doctor, we will begin another investigation, in which, also a bird will be the chief feature.”
So, we know their little expedition didn't even start till at least seven. Probably took at least an hour or so. So supper was sometime after 8 or 9pm.
I hope Mrs. Hudson wasn't keeping things warm all that time.
At this point in the story I see an image of the long suffering Mrs. Hudson more as she is portrayed in 'Sherlock' than in Granada's Sherlock Holmes.
Although we now use the words dinner and supper interchangeably to mean the same thing, our largest meal of the day. It has not always been as such.
Well, at least in certain cultures.
Most of us have grown up in a society that now runs on three meals a day; breakfast, lunch and dinner.
At least that is the way my family has always done it.
Breakfast, usually oatmeal or cereal (with bacon and eggs on weekends).
Lunch, what ever mom packed for school or the lunch ladies cooked.
And dinner, when dad got home from work, and our biggest meal of the day.
I don't remember us ever having a distinction between the use of the words dinner or supper, although I seem to have been called to more 'dinner times' than 'supper times'.
For much of the English speaking world dinner is the biggest meal of the day, usually taken sometime between noon and early evening.
Even the now traditional Sunday Roast is sometimes called Sunday Dinner or Roast Dinner.
In the USA we usually eat our Thanksgiving or Christmas meals early in the afternoon and they are usually referred to as Thanksgiving Dinner or Christmas Dinner.
And supper would be a lighter meal taken later in the evening. The etymology of supper is usually seen to come from some form of soup. Which would suggest a light meal.
For much of it's modern history the time of 'dinner' seemed to keep getting pushed back, until what had been a meal taken at two or three in the afternoon, to now easily taking place much later, at say six or seven. One survey by an Australian winemaker found that the average time in the UK for the evening meal is now about 7:47 pm.
Throw into the mix 'Tea Time' and what time that could take place, and what is served with 'Tea Time' and it can get real confusing.
Where I have always assumed 'Tea Time' was at 4pm, source suggest it can also be taken some time between 5 and 7.
It is associated with the working class and is typically eaten between 5 pm and 7 pm. In the North of England, North and South Wales, the English Midlands, Scotland and in rural and working class areas of Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, people traditionally call their midday meal dinner and their evening meal tea(served around 6 pm), whereas the upper social classes would call the midday meal lunch or luncheon and the evening meal (served after 7 pm) dinner (if formal) or supper (if informal). Source
So, with all that said, there doesn't seem to be any firm set rules of when you call what, it just depends on where you grow up.
With that said; what prompted this inquiry was when Sherlock Holmes says, “Very glad to see you. I dine at seven. There is a woodcock, I believe. By the way, in view of recent occurrences, perhaps I ought to ask Mrs. Hudson to examine its crop.”
And then a few minutes later Holmes and Watson have the following exchange; “It is quite certain that he knows nothing whatever about the matter. Are you hungry, Watson?”
“Not particularly.”
“Then I suggest that we turn our dinner into a supper and follow up this clue while it is still hot.'
This suggests that, one; dinner was going to be Holmes big meal of the day. Two; it was going to be rather late, seven. And three; super would be a very late, a much lighter meal (maybe cold woodcock sandwiches?).
We must also remember that this habit of assigning times to meals can also be considered an industrial age habit and mostly, as suggested, a middle and upper class tradition. Poor countries and rural workers were more likely to take the meals when time and abundance allowed.
These are the Canonical discussion that made me wonder how we use the words dinner and supper.
BLUE ends with Holmes saying to Watson, "If you will have the goodness to touch the bell, Doctor, we will begin another investigation, in which, also a bird will be the chief feature.”
So, we know their little expedition didn't even start till at least seven. Probably took at least an hour or so. So supper was sometime after 8 or 9pm.
I hope Mrs. Hudson wasn't keeping things warm all that time.
At this point in the story I see an image of the long suffering Mrs. Hudson more as she is portrayed in 'Sherlock' than in Granada's Sherlock Holmes.
Monday, October 23, 2017
Under, "I did not know this!"
A.A. Milne played for the amateur English cricket team the Allahakbarries alongside authors J. M. Barrie and Arthur Conan Doyle.
Allahakbarries.
Allahakbarries.
Monday, March 21, 2016
Just another side of the story. . . .
A Study in Spiritualism: What happened when the creator of Sherlock Holmes visited Tacoma
Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/article51980580.html#storylink=cpy
Read more here: http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/local/article51980580.html#storylink=cpy
BY DEBBIE CAFAZZO
Whenever you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
— Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, author and physician, 1859-1930
1 of 3
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Public domain Public domain
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is best known as the author of the Sherlock Holmes stories.
But what many Sherlock fans might not know is that the man who created the world’s most famous fictional detective — a character who epitomizes the rational and the scientific — also championed a mystical practice called spiritualism.
Spiritualism posits, among other things, that the living can communicate with the dead. Conan Doyle wrote several books on the subject, attended seances and traveled the world proselytizing for the cause.
And, in June 1923, the famous author stopped in Tacoma as part of a North American spiritualism speaking tour.
This week, as Holmes comes to life once again in a new BBC special airing on American public television, it’s a good moment to learn more about the time Conan Doyle visited the City of Destiny to talk about the afterlife, ghostly ectoplasm and a grisly Tacoma murder.
I HAVE HELD THE ECTOPLASM BETWEEN MY FINGERS, AND IT SEEMS TO BE ALIVE, VITALIZED
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Spiritualism gained popularity in the early 20th century, thanks in part to famous disciples such as Conan Doyle.
Back in 1923, The Tacoma Daily Ledger treated his visit as a celebrity event. It was front page news. The Ledger offered an advance story — a fanciful account of a supposed encounter on a train between the great author and a Ledger reporter. The surprise ending reveals all, and it turns out to be a case of mistaken identity on the part of the reporter.
But when the real Conan Doyle came to town, The Ledger was ready.
The newspaper covered his lecture, delivered at what then was called the Scottish Rite Cathedral, a type of Masonic lodge. Today, the building next to Wright Park is the home of the Tacoma Bible Presbyterian Church and Western Reformed Seminary.
The Ledger reported on the author’s visit in its June 11 edition under the headline, “Religion futile, says lecturer; mysteries of ectoplasm are explained by English author and scientist.”
The Ledger offered Conan Doyle’s description of ectoplasm: “a plastic substance, not yet fully understood, which comes from the body of the medium” (a person with psychic power who can communicate with the dead).
“I have held the ectoplasm between my fingers, and it seems to be alive, vitalized,” Conan Doyle continued. “It must not be confused with the spirits, for they are only using it.”
Conan Doyle described his views on the afterlife, which he likened to a beautiful park or a bucolic countryside.
He told Tacomans why he believed spiritualism was on the rise: “Old religions have lost their power and the new revelations have come to give man something tangible to comfort him … what we have got to find now is a religion that will be compelling — and that is exactly what we get in these new revelations.”
READ THE WORD ‘PROPHET’ AS ‘MEDIUM,’ AND ‘ANGEL’ AS ‘HIGH PRIEST.’
Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Perhaps the most interesting Ledger article was one in which Conan Doyle speculated on the outcome of an unsolved Tacoma murder.
More than a year before the writer came to Tacoma, a husband and wife had disappeared from their home. Circumstances, The Ledger revealed, led police to believe the wife had been murdered and cremated in the heating stove of their house. The husband had not been found, The Ledger reported.
As Conan Doyle and the reporter strolled through the rear garden of the Tacoma Hotel, The Ledger asked whether a medium might help crack the case.
“Many mysterious cases have been solved with the aid of mediums, when all other means have failed,” Conan Doyle said.
He recommended a medium named Van Berg, who then was in Portland and reportedly coming to Tacoma soon. Van Berg had found a missing banker’s body in London by “surrounding himself with the dead man’s effects and concentrating on a crystal ball,” Conan Doyle related.
“Could you solve the case?” The Ledger asked.
“No,” Sir Arthur admitted. “I could not. I do not posses mediumistic powers myself.”
Conan Doyle then went on to discuss several other phenomena. He said Ouija boards, in the hands of the right mediums, could be used by the spirit world to send messages to us.
And he spoke of his belief that even the Bible supports spiritualism: “Read the word ‘prophet’ as ‘medium,’ and ‘angel’ as ‘high priest.’ ”
BY THE TIME HE WAS IN HIS LATE TEENS, ARTHUR CONAN DOYLE HAD FALLEN AWAY FROM THE CATHOLIC FAITH OF HIS CHILDHOOD
What drew Conan Doyle to this mysterious practice?
Born into a Catholic family in Edinburgh, Scotland, Conan Doyle was the son of an artist who also suffered from mental illness and alcoholism.
Young Arthur attended a Jesuit school, then studied medicine at the University of Edinburgh. That is where he met Joseph Bell, a brilliant diagnostician whose powers of observation, Conan Doyle would later say, inspired the character of Sherlock Holmes.
By the time he was in his late teens, Conan Doyle had fallen away from the faith of his childhood. He declared himself an agnostic, but at the same time he started reading about what were called the “new religions.”
As a young physician, he was fascinated by practices such as hypnotism, mesmerism and other paranormal experiments that coexisted with science in his era.
Conan Doyle attended his first seance in 1880. He would later write: “After weighing the evidence, I could no more doubt the existence of the phenomena than I could doubt the existence of lions in Africa.”
Spiritualists believe the dead continue to evolve as they make their way into an afterlife that is more advanced than human existence. They believe the spirits of the dead can serve as a moral and ethical guide for the living.
Conan Doyle came to fully embrace spiritualism after the death of his son, Kingsley. Wounded at the Battle of the Somme in World War I, Kingsley was recovering from his battlefield injuries when he was struck down by the Spanish influenza epidemic.
Like other relatives of the war dead, Conan Doyle was grief-stricken, and bitter. He declared: “Christianity is dead. How else could 10 million young men have marched out to slaughter?”
Conan Doyle and his wife attended a seance, where the writer was convinced he heard a message so personal that it had to have come from Kingsley.
“It was his voice and he spoke of concerns unknown to the medium,” Conan Doyle said.
MOST OF THE SPIRIT PHOTOGRAPHERS WERE EVENTUALLY DISCREDITED
His fascination with the supernatural soon grew to include other phenomena as well.
Spirit photography purported to show the dead appearing to the living in the form of photographs. A portrait of an individual would appear, with a ghostly image of a deceased loved one peering just over the subject’s shoulder.
Conan Doyle wrote a book, “The Case for Spirit Photography,” and he posed for photos, including one that shows him and what he believed to be the spirit of his dead son.
Today, so-called spirit photographs can be recognized for what they are: double exposures. But photography in Conan Doyle’s day was not yet the familiar art it would later become with the invention of smaller, more portable cameras that made photos accessible to everyone.
Most of the spirit photographers were eventually discredited as frauds. But Conan Doyle continued to defend them.
He also took up the cause of two cousins from Cottingley, England. The two young ladies became famous for their appearances in a series of five photographs that seemed to show them frolicking in the woods with miniature fairies.
Conan Doyle wrote about the photos in The Strand magazine, the same publication that had published some of his Sherlock Holmes stories. Although the photos of the Cottingley Fairies, as they came to be known, were widely criticized as fakes, Conan Doyle said they offered more evidence of the existence of the supernatural world.
Again, he fought back with a book, “The Coming of the Fairies.”
Many years later, the two cousins admitted most of the photos had been faked, using cardboard cutouts. But one of the girls still maintained that the fifth photo was real.
IN THE SHERLOCK HOLMES STORY, “THE FINAL PROBLEM,” CONAN DOYLE TRIED TO KILL OFF HIS DETECTIVE
Conan Doyle met Harry Houdini when the magician and escape artist toured Europe. They found they shared a mutual interest in the afterlife and seances, where Houdini sought to contact his beloved deceased mother. The writer and the master of illusion struck up a friendship.
But Houdini’s knowledge of how to pull off a good trick soon led him to believe that mediums were nothing but scam artists who preyed upon the grieving and were trying to profit from the spiritualist movement.
He set out to debunk them. That led to a public feud between Conan Doyle and Houdini that played out in an exchange of letters in The New York Times.
Houdini wasn’t alone in criticizing Conan Doyle. Throughout his lifetime, the author faced opposition from skeptics and scientists. But his fame from writing the Holmes stories — not to mention the wealth the stories generated — meant Conan Doyle could afford to dismiss his critics. And he often did so in print.
But celebrity was a double-edged sword for Conan Doyle. He came to regard the fame that the Holmes stories brought him as something of a curse, and a distraction from more serious writing.
In the story, “The Final Problem,” Conan Doyle tried to kill off his detective. At the end of the story, readers were led to believe that Holmes and his evil arch-rival, Professor Moriarty, had tumbled to their deaths as they fought above a Swiss waterfall.
But Holmes fans wouldn’t allow their beloved Sherlock to die. Public pressure eventually forced Conan Doyle to resurrect Holmes in what many regard as one of the finest Holmes stories, “The Hound of the Baskervilles.”
Shortly after Conan Doyle died on July 7, 1930, a large gathering was held in his honor in the Royal Albert Hall in London. Four years later, more than 500 people turned up at a seance at which a recording was made, allegedly of Conan Doyle speaking from “the other side.”
You can listen to the recording at the website of the British Library, where Conan Doyle delivers a message that says, in part, “Take care of my boys and my good wife, Jean,” and “God help our movement forward.”
Debbie Cafazzo: 253-597-8635, @DebbieCafazzo
SIR ARTHUR CONAN DOLYE IN SOUND AND ON FILM
This is supposedly a recording of Arthur Conan Doyle speaking from beyond the grave:bit.ly/1QX3tvy
This is a recording of Conan Doyle speaking about spiritualism: bit.ly/1NSXv93
This is a short film in which Conan Doyle talks about both Sherlock Holmes and spiritualism:bit.ly/1OUSwod
Labels:
Doyle,
History,
In The News,
Other Blogs,
others essay
Thursday, March 17, 2016
Happy St. Parrick's day!
Arthur Conan Doyle’s Irish Mystery
.
As Sherlock Holmes fans celebrate the 125th anniversary of the novel in which Arthur Conan Doyle introduced his famous sleuth, Tom Deignan investigates the author’s Irish roots.
The two recent Sherlock Holmes movies starring Robert Downey, Jr. and Jude Law have earned well over one billion dollars worldwide, so it’s no surprise that screenwriters are currently toiling away at another installment of the lucrative franchise. Current Hollywood buzz has it that filming of the third Sherlock Holmes flick will begin sometime next year, with the movie in theaters possibly by Christmas 2014.
Sherlock Holmes — who celebrates his 125th birthday this year — shows no signs of slowing down. Author Arthur Conan Doyle’s most famous creation, who first appeared in the 1887 murder mystery novel A Study in Scarlet, has had a long life in books and on radio, in television and stage adaptations, and in the movies.
Generations of Sherlock Holmes fans have watched the sleuth, alongside his trusty sidekick Dr. Watson, wield his trademark magnifying glass in order to navigate fog-shrouded British streets, debating theories in plummy accents. The most iconic Holmes, perhaps, is Basil Rathbone, who played the great detective in over a dozen films, and even Robert Downey, Jr. earned raves for his British accent.
Though he never really went out of style, Doyle is currently enjoying a renaissance. In addition to the film franchise, consulting detective Holmes is also the subject of two hit television series that give Doyle’s stories a contemporary spin: In Britain, the BBC mini-series Sherlock, starring Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman, and in the U.S., the new CBS show Elementary, featuring Johnny Lee Miller, Lisa Liu, and Aidan Quinn.
Exploring Irish History
Given Sherlock Holmes’ undeniable British pedigree, it may come as a surprise to some that his creator actually comes from a strong Irish Catholic background. Indeed, both the Conan and Doyle families — not to mention the Foleys, on the great writer’s mother’s side — all hail from Dublin. One of Arthur’s uncles, Henry Doyle, was a prominent artist who went on to serve as director of the National Gallery of Ireland.
Given Sherlock Holmes’ undeniable British pedigree, it may come as a surprise to some that his creator actually comes from a strong Irish Catholic background. Indeed, both the Conan and Doyle families — not to mention the Foleys, on the great writer’s mother’s side — all hail from Dublin. One of Arthur’s uncles, Henry Doyle, was a prominent artist who went on to serve as director of the National Gallery of Ireland.
As for Arthur Conan Doyle himself, though best known for creating Sherlock Holmes, he also wrote many stories that explore Irish themes and characters. Perhaps most interesting to Irish Americans is the fourth and final Sherlock Homes novel, The Valley of Fear (1915), which may have been inspired by two notable episodes in Irish history — the rise of the Molly Maguires, the secret organization that sought to improve labor conditions in Pennsylvania in the 1870s, and the Phoenix Park murders in Dublin in May of 1882. (Lord Frederick Cavendish, the newly appointed Chief Secretary for Ireland, and Thomas Henry Burke, the Permanent Undersecretary, were fatally stabbed by members of the Irish National Invincibles.)
More broadly, Doyle (1859 – 1930) was alive to witness some of the most tumultuous years of Irish political history, from the post-Famine years to the Easter Rising to the Irish Civil War.
Doyle actively followed the so-called “Irish question” and corresponded with prominent Irish nationalists such as Erskine Childers and Roger Casement.
However, from his fiction to his political positions, Doyle was complicated. For example, despite his strong Irish roots, he once defended British policy in Ireland. So it is fitting that the greatest mystery writer of them all has created quite a mystery about his own past: Precisely how did Arthur Conan Doyle’s Irish background influence his writing?
A Dublin Family
John Doyle (Arthur’s grandfather) was born in Dublin in 1797, into a devoutly Catholic family with an artistic bent. John, who was already showcasing his work at 17, married fellow Dubliner Marianne Conan, a daughter of a tailor, in 1820. Two years later they sought a new life in London, where they soon had three children while John was struggling to succeed as a painter.
John Doyle (Arthur’s grandfather) was born in Dublin in 1797, into a devoutly Catholic family with an artistic bent. John, who was already showcasing his work at 17, married fellow Dubliner Marianne Conan, a daughter of a tailor, in 1820. Two years later they sought a new life in London, where they soon had three children while John was struggling to succeed as a painter.
After changing his artistic style, John Doyle eventually found success as a political cartoonist. The children kept on coming, as the family moved to the more affluent neighborhood of Hyde Park. They lived in a home where party guests included Benjamin Disraeli and Charles Dickens.
John and Marianne gave birth to Arthur Conan Doyle’s father, Charles, in 1832.
The great writer’s mother, meanwhile, was born in Dublin. The daughter of a doctor who died young, Mary Foley moved to Edinburgh, Scotland, where her mother established a boardinghouse. Charles also had moved to Scotland as a young man. Mary Foley and Charles Doyle married in 1855 and settled in Edinburgh.
Doyle himself acknowledged his strong Irish roots in his 1924 autobiography Memories and Adventures. “I, an Irishman by extraction, was born in the Scottish capital,” Doyle wrote.
Of his parents, he said: “Two separate lines of Irish wanderers came together under one roof.”
A Visit to Waterford
Arthur Ignatius Conan Doyle was born on May 22, 1859. He was baptized at St. Mary’s Cathedral and received a Jesuit education into his teenage years, before studying medicine at the University of Edinburgh.
Arthur Ignatius Conan Doyle was born on May 22, 1859. He was baptized at St. Mary’s Cathedral and received a Jesuit education into his teenage years, before studying medicine at the University of Edinburgh.
Doyle was only 20 years old when he published his first story in a Scottish journal. As early as 1881, Doyle spent time with family in Ireland, visiting Waterford during a time of agrarian unrest that came to be called “The Land War.” Doyle wrote of his time in Ireland in an essay (with photographs) called “To the Waterford Coast and Along It.”
In 1885, Doyle married Louisa Hawkins, and the couple went to Ireland for their honeymoon. Throughout the 1880s, however, Doyle struggled as both a writer and doctor. Patients were not exactly knocking down the door of his practice, and publishers and journals rejected many of Doyle’s manuscripts. One magazine that finally agreed to publish a new work by Arthur Conan Doyle was Beeton’s Christmas Annual. The November 1887 edition of that magazine contained a story called “A Study in Scarlet.” Critics in The Scotsman and Glasgow Herald newspapers liked the story. Little did they know that the history of literature was about to change.
Sherlock — and Support for Irish Home Rule?
“A Study in Scarlet” was the first story to feature a detective named Sherlock Holmes and his sidekick Dr. Watson. Doyle eventually achieved widespread popularity, with Holmes starring in three subsequent novels: The Sign of the Four (1890), The Hound of the Baskervilles (1902) and The Valley of Fear (1915).
“A Study in Scarlet” was the first story to feature a detective named Sherlock Holmes and his sidekick Dr. Watson. Doyle eventually achieved widespread popularity, with Holmes starring in three subsequent novels: The Sign of the Four (1890), The Hound of the Baskervilles (1902) and The Valley of Fear (1915).
But just as he was more or less creating the modern detective novel, Doyle was also exploring Irish themes in stories such as “That Little Square Box,” “The Heiress of Glenmahowley,” “Touch and Go: A Midshipman’s Story,” and “The Green Flag.”
“These stories are testimonies to Doyle’s keen and sympathetic interest in Irish political grievances,” writes Catherine Wynne, author of the scholarly text The Colonial Conan Doyle.
And yet, despite his roots and his visits to Ireland, the now-successful Arthur Conan Doyle opposed Irish Home Rule in the early 1900s.
“I was what was called a Liberal-Unionist, that is, a man whose general position was Liberal, but who could not see his way to support Gladstone’s Irish Policy,” Doyle himself wrote in his memoirs, referring to the British prime minister who supported Home Rule for Ireland.
The famous writer’s attitude changed in the coming decade. In February 1912 he wrote a letter to Roger Casement stating: “Yes, I feel strongly for Ireland and hope I may strike some blow in that cause.”
On the other hand, Doyle felt compelled to add: “I see the British point of view very clearly, also. However, from both points of view, I am convinced that Home Rule is the solution.”
Scholars such as Catherine Wynne believe Doyle never quite resolved the tensions he felt about Ireland. On the one hand he saw himself as an Irishman, visited Ireland and followed the political situation there. But he was also a successful writer who shied away from more radical political ideas. Wynne believes this conflict manifested itself in Doyle’s writing, leading him to follow the tradition of Gothic Irish literature, a genre perhaps best exemplified by the Dublin-born writer Bram Stroker, the author of Dracula.
Doyle and Ireland
Doyle’s “preoccupations with colonialism are demonstrated in recurring obsessions with land, mind, racial identity and sexuality,” Wynne writes. “The Gothic is an important mode within the colonial context because… it gives a voice to those who are without power and are disenfranchised.”
Doyle’s “preoccupations with colonialism are demonstrated in recurring obsessions with land, mind, racial identity and sexuality,” Wynne writes. “The Gothic is an important mode within the colonial context because… it gives a voice to those who are without power and are disenfranchised.”
Doyle’s complex take on Irish matters is perhaps most evident in the final Sherlock Holmes novel, Valley of Fear.
Part of the novel takes place in 1875, and features a meeting on a train during which two passengers (one carrying a gun) identify themselves as members of a secret society most critics believe was based on the Molly Maguires.
Doyle was said to be fascinated by James McParland, the detective who infiltrated the Molly Maguires. He met with William Pinkerton – head of the private detective agency that McParland worked for – and many speculate that hearing the Molly Maguires story from Pinkerton inspired Doyle to write Valley of Fear and to base the detective character on McParland, who was born in Armagh.
One of the key characters in Valley of Fear is lost at sea. However, Sherlock Holmes fears he was in fact executed and thrown overboard. This echoes the death of James Carey, who informed on his fellow comrades in the Irish National Invincibles, the group that perpetrated the murders in Phoenix Park. Carey was shot dead on board a ship by Donegal man Patrick O’Donnell, an Irish revolutionary who likely had relatives who belonged to – you guessed it – the Molly Maguires. O’Donnell may even have visited Pennsylvania as part of his search for the informant who exposed the Phoenix Park assassins.
In the end, Arthur Conan Doyle’s relationship with Ireland may have been complicated, but it was most certainly intimate. In fact, if Robert Downey, Jr. and Jude Law stay at this long enough, it’s more than likely that they will someday be in a scene featuring an Irish-American coal miner with a gun on a train.
Labels:
Doyle,
essay,
History,
others essay,
Trivia,
What to do think?
Friday, August 7, 2015
I have no proof that it is based on our Moriarty. . .
. . . but there seems to have been, and probably still is, a parlour game called, 'Are you there Moriarty?' It is used in a book I am reading about the RAF.
Wiki for an explanation;
Wiki for an explanation;
Are you there Moriarty? is a parlour game in which two players at a time participate in a duel of sorts. Each player is blindfolded and given a rolled up newspaper (or anything that comes handy and is not likely to injure) to use as a weapon. The players then lie on their fronts head to head with about three feet (one metre) of space between them - or in other versions hold outstretched hands, or stand holding hands as in a handshake. The starting player says "Are you there Moriarty?". The other player, when ready, says "Yes". At this point the start player attempts to hit the other player with his newspaper by swinging it over his head. The other player then attempts to hit the starting player with his newspaper. The first player to be hit is eliminated from the game and another player takes his place. The objective of the game is to remain in the game as long as possible.
There is a small amount of strategy to the game. In order to avoid being hit, each player may roll to one side or the other. The decision of which direction to roll, or whether to roll at all often determines whether the player is hit by his opponent. A player who can quickly roll out of the way after speaking or striking will have a definite advantage in the game. However, like most parlour games, the appeal of this game largely lies in its spectacle and humor rather than its strategy.
Friday, July 24, 2015
Monday, April 13, 2015
I wonder. . .
TWIS - "At the foot of the stairs, however, she met
this Lascar scoundrel of whom I have spoken, who
thrust her back. . ."
Have you ever wondered what or whom a Lascar is?
Lascar found here.
Have you ever wondered what or whom a Lascar is?
Lascar found here.
Tuesday, January 27, 2015
Tuesday, January 6, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








