Showing posts with label Lists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lists. Show all posts

Friday, September 15, 2017

Well at least he made the list. . . .

Harry Potter, the British Royals and Premier League football revealed as the main reasons why tourists come to the UK

But good old British grub apparently isn't appealing...

Chinese tourists visiting Britain come for the Royal FamilyHarry Potter and Premier Leaguefootball, but sidestep seaside fish and chips, a Visit Britain report has suggested.
More than 250,000 holidaymakers from China spent more than half a billion pounds in the UK last year and these figures are expected to grow sharply fuelled by growing middle and affluent classes.
The report revealed that Chinese tourists rate Britain highly for both its heritage and contemporary culture with a particular focus on museums and films.
It said: "They are mostly interested in symbolic elements: the Royal Family, ShakespeareSherlock Holmes, Harry Potter and Downton Abbey.
"The Chinese outbound market is booming: visits abroad more than doubled in five years, from about 41m overnight stays in 2011 to 85m in 2016. By 2020, it is forecast to exceed 110m trips overseas."

Wednesday, March 16, 2016

Just goes to show what I know.

Here is was, thinking I was on the edge of Sherlockian greatness. I should have known better.
I was going to take all the untold cases of Sherlock Holmes and come up with a four letter abbreviation list for them.
I was making good head way.
But I kept digging to make sure I had not missed any.
And low and behold, I found it had already been done.
Like I said, I should have known.

Here is the list compiled by Sherlockian Chris Redmond

Chris Redmonds list

I will have to find another way to be ranked with the Sherlockian elite (I want to hang out with Brad).
Wait, Okay, I know! I'll abbreviate the whole Canon! Any word over four letters, abbreviate!
That's it!

Tuesday, June 9, 2015

And so it begins - Mr. Fosters Opus

All my ducks are in a row, and needed supplies are on hand.

The research has begun.

I am using the Baring-Gould because I have several of the one time $19.95 books on hand and had always planned on one of them being sacrificed for research.

Yellow highlighter is for one research project, and blue for another.
Who knows, other colors may be added.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

A rather quick survey. . . .

It has been said that Basil Rathbone loathed the fact that he was primarily known as the actor who played Sherlock Holmes to the greater public. Disappointed that some of his better works were not the reason he was best remembered.
We, as Sherlockians, know of Basil Rathbone's other works, as I am sure do most film historians.
But probably not the general public, if they know him, now, at all.

I did a quick check, using the list on wikipedia, to see how many actors who have played Sherlock Holmes over the years, were introduced as 'being best known as playing Sherlock Holmes' or some wording close to that, within the first one or two introductory paragraphs.

It is surprising, out of that list of well over fifty, how few actors are first introduced as 'being best known as playing Sherlock Holmes.'

Of the rest, many are great actors who are known for other rolls.
Others are actors not all that well known for anything memorable.

Now the question I have is: As an actor, would you want that to be your claim to fame, 'the actor best known for playing Sherlock Holmes'? Is that how you want to best be remembered? Or is it something you come to accept?
Does being remembered as such usually mean your performance as Holmes is accepted as an accurate or note worthy adaptation of the original?

Most of the ones that do share that claim to fame are ones that are still discussed as some of the best Sherlock Holmes portrayals seen on film.

Interestingly, at least for me, of all the actors, the only one I really have any knowledge of other notable film rolls happens to be Rathbone. All the others on the list I would have to research their other rolls.

Here is the ones I was able to pick out as being introduce as 'an actor now known best for his portrayal of Sherlock Holmes'. The list was done quickly, so may not be totally complete, but I think it is fairly close.

Jeremy Brett - not publicly known for other major film works
Nicholas Rowe - not publicly know for other major film works
Douglas Wilmer - in the 50's and 60's known for other works perhaps, but remembered as Holmes
Arthur Wontner - not known for other works
William Gillette - to long ago for most to know him for anything else (but was a major contributor to the world of Sherlock Holmes on stage and film.)
Ellie Norwood - again, maybe to long ago, but now best known as Holmes
Hugo Flink - Austrian actor known as one of the earliest actors to play Sherlock Holmes
Basil Rathbone -

Vasily Livanov - it is noted that his greatest success came at playing Holmes, but he is not introduced, yet, that way.

I have only hard that Nigel Bruce never regretted his association with one of Doyle's characters, but I have never heard of a Holmes actor that felt the same way. Although I get the feeling Douglas Wilmer may feel that way now. But did he as a younger actor.
Rathbone seemed to embrace the association later in life. But I get the feeling it felt like a burden for many years.

I don't think it will happen with the three current actors portraying Sherlock Holmes. Is that because their other work is better than their Holmes work?  Or is because their Holmes aren't that good?


Monday, November 4, 2013

Which one are you, where do you fit in?

As with anything, we usually categorize our place in what we do and the things we enjoy and hope are good at.
Whether it is a hobby, a skill or a job, we rank somewhere. It may be a self ranking, or it may be placed on us by someone else. We may place ourselves in the same place that other people place us, or we may place ourselves higher in rank or lower.
In sports we have different rankings by how big your school is, or by region. We also have amateur (who's lines are somewhat blurred) and professionals (who are sometimes beaten by armatures.)
Some groups or organizations have set up lists of standards that determine where we stand in certain rankings within said group.
Some groups just decide whether or not we are ready for whatever rankings they have determined qualify us to be part of their group, and may even change their system to exclude individuals.
There may be one group that participates in something you like that thinks you deserve a very high ranking in their eyes, while just around the corner another group participating in the same, may think you deserve lower.
Unless it is a mathematical equation deciding the ranking, it's mostly just a point of view.
But, none-the-less, we as humans participate voluntarily in some sort of ranking system whether we realize it or not.

Sherlockians have lots of rankings, and can usually be pretty vocal about it, especially if someones ranking system differs from their own. We rank our favorite stories. We rank chronologies. We rank what makes good scholarship and what makes bad. We even rank what counts as Sherlockian scholarship. Some of us can even get offended if the ones doing some of the rankings don't see our work fit to be included.
It's all a matter of context.

But let's play anyway and see where we set ourselves.
This is by no means anything more than fun and my opinion, which is apt to change whenever someone else presents a point I like better than my own.

For most Sherlockian observers, the highest Sherlockian or Holmesian ranking, or recognition, most would agree would be being accepted and invited to join a group like the Baker Street Irregulars. I think this would be especially true for anyone who has a more scholarly interest in the Canon of Sherlock Holmes.
But even up at these lofty heights can be found even more seemly hard to obtain heights. 
Here would be the purists, the ones who consider the works of Doyle and the study of Holmes only possible at a literary level. How the works hold up as literature. No 'Playing the game' for them. The books are all about the content and how it applies to Doyle. 
I don't think I know any of these. At a scholastic level, they are way above me. I dangle way to many participles and use way to many comas to travel in that rarefied air. My hat is off to them however. They keep the works pure and true and are a wonderful back bone to all of us who travel near by.

Just below them can possibly be found the Sherlockian/Doylean Purists.  These are the ones who have made there name in the world of Sherlock Holmes by Playing the Game. But playing the game only as far as facts that can be proven. No speculation. Just the facts, man, no filling in the blanks. 

Just below them could be the Sherlockians who are willing to speculate a little more about details not completely factual. This perhaps would be the most populace group. They would perhaps suggest that if we can find enough clues close enough to our theories then perhaps we must be right or it could be so. But to be on this level you must have a talent for presenting things in a scholarly manner. (Separating the wheat from the chaff as it were.)
This group would probably be the harshest on people who don't see eye to eye with them.

And of perhaps equal but different ranking are the Sherlockians who have found a scholarly why to explore the world of Sherlock Holmes in other media besides the books, yet are recognized as authorities, enough so as to get them invite to join the BSI or like minded group.
Also in this group would be those who have been recognized for contributing in some other why to the world of Sherlock Holmes or Doyle that sets them apart from others, i.e actors, politicians, etc.

At this point our ranks starting falling out of the ranks of groups like the BSI.
Next we find the group that aspires to make it to the BSI. These are the ones hoping some day to prove they have what it takes. They run scion societies. They start other scholarly groups. They organize major events.
They collect rooms full of books and memorabilia. ( I think many of us fall near this group, even if we won't admit it.  ??) They can be at it for years and still never make it. Many find their energy is well spent, eventually.

Just below this group would be probably the largest single group, (well at least till Benedict Cumberbatch came along) and that would be those who are really involved in the world of Doyle and Holmes, but on a more local level. They are content in the world they participate in and don't wish to achieve loftier heights, so to speak. Or know their own limitations. They enjoy Playing the Game for the games sake, in a social no-expectation atmosphere. 
They can even have their own levels within their groups. Some Playing the Game a little purer than others. Some willing to accept all things Holmesian, while others have their limits. Some are flamboyant in their participation, while others reserved. (I think I place myself mostly here.)

Next would be, perhaps, the group that is now being called 'fans'. The ones who have come along recently on the tails of the RDJ movies or the popularity of 'Sherlock'.  They are only in it for what their chosen source material suggests. Many, hopefully will move beyond this level and start realizing the real works of Holmes and Watson. But if they don't, that's OK also.

I must admit, I am not sure where I would place cos-play Sherlockians, I am to unfamiliar with them.

This is rather a simplified investigation of Sherlockian levels, and within each one, they can be broken down even more.

Let me know your thoughts and I may yet add more.

Whatever level you place yourself at, I hope you are having a lot of fun with it.

Tuesday, August 6, 2013

Seven Degrees of Sherlock Holmes - #15 - Michael Keaton

This one came together quicker than I expected, and had lots of connections.

Here goes.

Michael Keaton - (1951)


was in the hilarious film "Mr. Mom" - 1983


which also featured the delightful and beautiful Terri Garr (1944)


who was in the very funny "Young Frankenstein" - 1974


which featured not only Gene Wilder (1933)


but also funny man Marty Felman (1934-1982)


and the gone to early, talented Madeline Kahn (1942-1999)


who all had a heck of a fun time in "The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes Smarter Brother" - 1975


There you have it, there you are.








Thursday, August 1, 2013

Reading list for August

I am again using two sources, Sherlock Peoria and Chris J Miller's list. If you have other lists, please let me know and I will use them, perhaps.

Here goes.

Sherlock Peoria                                      Story                          C. Miller

30th, 1887                                        CROO                          Summer 1888
30th, 1889                                        CARD                          Poss. 1882
1st,   1894                                        NORW                         1895
20th, 1898                                        RETI                            Summer 1898
2nd, 1914                                         LAST                           1914


That's a lot of reading for this month. Get busy.


Tuesday, July 2, 2013

Seven Degrees of Sherlock Holmes - #10 - Nicolas Cage

Never one of my favorite actors, he has none-the-less been in some of my favorite fun movies.
Born in 1964, he does come from a very talented family of Academics and performers.

So here goes. . .

Nicolas Cage - 1964 -


was in the film 'Racing with the Moon - 1984


which also featured the delightful Elizabeth McGovern - 1961


who now stars in Downton Abbey - 2010 


Which also stars Hugh Bonneville - 1963


who was in the 1994 Memoirs of Sherlock Holmes episode 'The Dying Detective' as Victor Savage




Nicolas Cage - there you have it, there you are.






Monday, March 18, 2013

Helpful and interesting. . .


Credit where credit is due. . .

publication order of Sherlock Holmes stories by Arthur Conan Doyle

(BCA) = Beeton's Christmas Annual
(LMM) = Lippincott's Monthly Magazine
(TSM) = The Strand Magazine
___
(HW) = Harper's Weekly
(M) = McClure's
(C) = Collier's
___
(AM) = American Magazine
(HIM) = Hearst's International Magazine
(L) = Liberty
first publication datestitles of storiescodesnarratoraction
011887 Nov (BCA)A Study in ScarletSTUDWatson
021890 Feb (LMM)The Sign of FourSIGNWatson
031891 Jul (TSM)1. A Scandal in BohemiaSCANWatson1888
041891 Aug (TSM)2. The Red-Headed LeagueREDHWatson1890
051891 Sep (TSM)3. A Case of IdentityIDENWatson
061891 Oct (TSM)4. The Boscombe Valley MysteryBOSCWatson
071891 Nov (TSM)5. The Five Orange PipsFIVEWatson1887
081891 Dec (TSM)6. The Man with the Twisted LipTWISWatson1889
091892 Jan (TSM)7. The Adventure of the Blue CarbuncleBLUEWatson
101892 Feb (TSM)8. The Adventure of the Speckled BandSPECWatson1883
111892 Mar (TSM)9. The Adventure of the Engineer's ThumbENGRWatson1889
121892 Apr (TSM)10. The Adventure of the Noble BachelorNOBLWatson
131892 May (TSM)11. The Adventure of the Beryl CoronetBERYWatson
141892 Jun (TSM)12. The Adventure of the Copper BeechesCOPPWatson
151892 Dec (TSM) (HW)13. The Adventure of Silver BlazeSILVWatson
161893 Jan (TSM) (HW)14. The Adventure of the Cardboard BoxCARDWatson
171893 Feb (TSM) (HW)15. The Adventure of the Yellow FaceYELLWatson
181893 Mar (TSM) (HW)16. The Adventure of the Stock-Broker's ClerkSTOCWatson
191893 Apr (TSM) (HW)17. The Adventure of the "Gloria Scott"GLORWatson
201893 May (TSM) (HW)18. The Adventure of the Musgrave RitualMUSGWatson
211893 Jun (TSM) (HW)19. The Adventure of the Reigate SquiresREIGWatson1887
221893 Jul (TSM) (HW)20. The Adventure of the Crooked ManCROOWatson
231893 Aug (TSM) (HW)21. The Adventure of the Resident PatientRESIWatson
241893 Sep (TSM) (HW)22. The Adventure of the Greek InterpreterGREEWatson
251893 Oct, Nov (TSM) (HW)23. The Adventure of the Naval TreatyNAVAWatson
261893 Dec (TSM) (M)24. The Adventure of the Final ProblemFINAWatson1891
271901 Aug — 1902 Apr (TSM)The Hound of the BaskervillesHOUNWatson
281903 Sep (C) (TSM)1. The Adventure of the Empty HouseEMPTWatson1894
291903 Oct (C) (TSM)2. The Adventure of the Norwood BuilderNORWWatson
301903 Dec (C) (TSM)3. The Adventure of the Dancing MenDANCWatson
311903 Dec (C) (TSM)4. The Adventure of the Solitary CyclistSOLIWatson1895
321904 Jan (C) (TSM)5. The Adventure of the Priory SchoolPRIOWatson
331904 Feb (C) (TSM)6. The Adventure of Black PeterBLACWatson1895
341904 Mar (C) (TSM)7. The Adventure of Charles Augustus MiIvertonCHASWatson
351904 Apr (C) (TSM)8. The Adventure of the Six NapoleonsSIXNWatson
361904 Jun (TSM) (C)9. The Adventure of the Three Students3STUWatson1895
371904 Jul (TSM) (C)10. The Adventure of the Golden Pince-NezGOLDWatson1894
381904 Aug (TSM) (C)11. The Adventure of the Missing Three-QuarterMISSWatson
391904 Sep (TSM) (C)12. The Adventure of the Abbey GrangeABBEWatson1897
401904 Dec (TSM) (C)13. The Adventure of the Second StainSECOWatson
411908 Aug (C) (TSM)The Adventure of Wisteria LodgeWISTWatson1892
421908 Dec (TSM) (C)The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington PlansBRUCWatson1895
431910 Dec (TSM)The Adventure of the Devil's FootDEVIWatson1897
441911 Mar, Apr (TSM)The Adventure of the Red CircleREDCWatson
451911 Dec (TSM) (AM)The Disappearance of Lady Frances CarfaxLADYWatson
461913 Nov (C) (TSM)The Adventure of the Dying DetectiveDYINWatson
471914 Sep — 1915 May (TSM)The Valley of FearVALLWatson
481917 Sep (TSM) (C)His Last BowLASTAnonym1914
491921 Oct (TSM) (HIM)The Adventure of the Mazarin StoneMAZAAnonym
501922 Feb, Mar (TSM) (HIM)The Problem of Thor BridgeTHORWatson
511923 Mar (TSM) (HIM)The Adventure of the Creeping ManCREEWatson1903
521924 Jan (TSM) (HIM)The Adventure of the Sussex VampireSUSSWatson
531924 Oct (C) (TSM)The Adventure of the Three Garridebs3GARWatson1902
541924 Nov (C) (TSM)The Adventure of the Illustrious ClientILLUWatson1902
551926 Sep (L) (TSM)The Adventure of the Three Gables3GABWatson
561926 Oct (L) (TSM)The Adventure of the Blanched SoldierBLANHolmes1903
571926 Nov (L) (TSM)The Adventure of the Lion's ManeLIONHolmes1907
581926 Dec (L) (TSM)The Adventure of the Retired ColourmanRETIWatson1898
591927 Jan (L) (TSM)The Adventure of the Veiled LodgerVEILWatson1896
601927 Mar (L) (TSM)The Adventure of Shoscombe Old PlaceSHOSWatson
The first publication dates refer to the first or only magazine listed for each story. Where a second
magazine is listed, publication dates can range from the same month to several months later. As is
shown, of the 60 stories, 58 of them appeared in The Strand Magazine.Titles with a blue background appeared in The Strand Magazine as Adventures of Sherlock Holmes.
Titles with a green background appeared in The Strand Magazine as The Return of Sherlock Holmes.
The date of 1892 given by Watson for WIST conflicts with what is told in EMPT.
In THOR, the next published story after the two narrated anonymously, Watson claimed authorship
of them: "In some I was myself concerned and can speak as an eye-witness, while in others I was
either not present or played so small a part that they could only be told as by a third person."

Friday, February 1, 2013

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Ladies, any thoughts?

The Best Sherlock Holmes Stories - 1999 Poll
Women versus Men

(sorted by Women's score)

Women RankingWomMenMen
Story%%Rank
1. "A Scandal in Bohemia" (9)10.27.43
2. "The Blue Carbuncle" (6)8.56.55
3. "The Speckled Band" (5)7.49.21.1
4. "Silver Blaze" (4)6.97.04
5.1. "The Red-Headed League" (2)5.59.21.1
5.1. "The Dancing Men" (1)5.53.811
7. "The Musgrave Ritual" (0)5.15.46
8. "The Empty House" (0)4.44.18
9. "The Final Problem" (0)4.14.77
10.1. "Charles Augustus Milverton" (0)2.91.818
10.1. "The Copper Beeches" (0)2.91.619
12. "The Solitary Cyclist" (0)2.91.223
13. "The Devil's Foot" (2)2.61.915
14. "The Second Stain" (0)2.31.916.1
15.1. "The Naval Treaty" (1)2.12.014
15.1. "The Six Napoleons" (0)2.14.09
17. "The Man with the Twisted Lip" (0)2.02.512
18. "The Norwood Builder" (0)2.00.926
19. "The Priory School" (0)1.81.916.1
20. "The Dying Detective" (0)1.81.125
21. "The Bruce-Partington Plans" (0)1.54.010
22. "The Greek Interpreter" (0)1.51.124
23. "The Illustrious Client" (0)1.50.729
24. "His Last Bow" (0)1.41.322
25.1. "The Cardboard Box" (0)1.00.632
25.1. "The Problem of Thor Bridge" (0)1.02.313
27. "The Abbey Grange" (0)0.91.420
28.1. "The Five Orange Pips" (0)0.91.321
28.1. "A Case of Identity" (0)0.90.436.1
28.1. "The Noble Bachelor" (0)0.90.248.1
31. "The Reigate Squires" (0)0.80.341
32. "The Three Garridebs" (0)0.70.436.1
33. "The Engineer's Thumb" (0)0.60.533.1
34. "The Crooked Man" (0)0.50.533.1
35.1. "Black Peter" (0)0.50.827
35.1. "The Red Circle" (0)0.50.439
37.1. "Shoscombe Old Place" (0)0.40.435
37.1. "The Yellow Face" (0)0.40.343
39. "The Lion's Mane" (0)0.30.731
40. "The Resident Patient" (0)0.30.345
41. "The Beryl Coronet" (0)0.20.247
42. "The Sussex Vampire" (0)0.20.346
43. "The Gloria Scott" (0)0.10.730
44.1. "The Boscombe Valley Mystery" (0)0.10.828
44.1. "The Creeping Man" (0)0.10.438
44.1. "The Mazarin Stone" (0)0.10.154
47. "Wisteria Lodge" (0)0.00.342
48.1. "The Three Gables" (0)0.00.056
48.1. "The Three Students" (0)0.00.248.1
48.1. "The Blanched Soldier" (0)0.00.151
48.1. "The Golden Pince-Nez" (0)0.00.250
48.1. "The Disappearance of Lady Frances Carfax" (0)0.00.340
48.1. "The Missing Three-Quarter" (0)0.00.152
48.1. "The Retired Colourman" (0)0.00.344
48.1. "The Stockbroker's Clerk" (0)0.00.153
48.1. "The Veiled Lodger" (0)0.00.055


From HERE!