Showing posts with label William Gillette. Show all posts
Showing posts with label William Gillette. Show all posts

Monday, January 26, 2015

SHIN - Just in from the BBC!

William Gillette: Five ways he transformed how Sherlock Holmes looks and talks


Clip from William Gillette's 1916 film adaptation of Sherlock Holmes - previously thought lost
A 1916 silent movie featuring Sherlock Holmes - long presumed lost - is due to have its premiere in Paris. It stars a man who changed the way we see Conan Doyle's famous sleuth forever.
He was the first great Sherlock Holmes. But few will have heard of US actor William Gillette.
He is thought to be a distant relation of the family behind Gillette razors, wrote plays about the American civil war, patented a noise to imitate the sound of a galloping horse and built an enormous castle in Connecticut. But it is his Holmes that fascinates people today.
And until three months ago, it seemed that no-one would ever see it.
Gillette adapted Sherlock Holmes for the stage in 1899 and played Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's detective more than 1,000 times.
He made only one film, the 1916 silent movie version of Sherlock Holmes. For decades the movie was presumed lost, one of the great missing links of Sherlockiana. Then in October 2014 it was discovered at the Cinematheque Francaise, a film archive in Paris.
"At last we get to see for ourselves the actor who kept the first generation of Sherlockians spellbound," says Professor Russell Merritt, who has been researching the film's origins. "As far as Holmes is concerned, there's not an actor dead or alive who hasn't consciously or intuitively played off Gillette."
Illustration of William Gillette as Sherlock HolmesA publicity photo of Gillette as Holmes
Not only was Gillette the Benedict Cumberbatch of his day. He was the actor who decided - perhaps more than any other - how Holmes looks and talks, and whose relationship with Conan Doyle may have breathed new life into the Sherlock Holmes franchise.
Here are five ways Gillette created the Holmes we know today.
Curved pipe
Two props evoke Sherlock Holmes above all others.
The first is the deerstalker. Conan Doyle's stories never mentioned his distinctive headgear - it was given to Holmes by the illustrator Sidney Paget when the stories were published in the Strand Magazine in 1891.
The other crucial object is his pipe. It's not an ornament but a part of Holmes's deductive ritual. "It is quite a three pipe problem, and I beg that you won't speak to me for fifty minutes," he says to Watson in the Red-Headed League.
The books describe a "black clay pipe thrusting out like the bill of some strange bird". Paget gave Holmes a straight pipe.
Sydney Paget illustration of Sherlock Holmes (with straight pipe) from The Strand magazineHolmes illustrated with straight pipe in The Strand magazine
But William Gillette's 1899 play and 1916 movie, in which he played Holmes, made a crucial change. The shaft of the pipe was no longer straight but curved.
"The story goes that he's able to deliver his lines while still smoking. A more traditional pipe and his hand would have been in front of his mouth," says Alex Werner, curator of the Museum of London's ongoing exhibition, "Sherlock Holmes: The Man Who Never Lived and Will Never Die."
The curved pipe stuck in the popular imagination and became "iconic", Werner says.
Basil Rathbone as Sherlock HolmesBasil Rathbone adopted the William Gillette pipe
There have been occasional amendments though. In the 1988 film Without a Clue, Michael Caine puffs on a more ostentatiously curvy pipe. And in the recent BBC TV series, Benedict Cumberbatch has a nicotine patch instead.
'Elementary, my dear fellow'
The most Holmesian phrase - "Elementary my dear Watson" - is never uttered in the books. Gillette is perhaps the man who did most to bring it in, although he never used the exact phrase.
In the play he wrote the line: "Elementary my dear fellow." Others subsequently swapped "fellow" with "Watson".
PG Wodehouse is often credited with this swap in his spoof novel Psmith. But the Oxford English Dictionary queries this.
It seems that the term was already being used in newspapers before Wodehouse's 1915 novel. So some uncertainty remains as to who coined it.
Conan Doyle included the term "elementary" in Holmes's deductive vernacular. He also included "my dear Watson". But never in the same sentence.
It seems that Gillette almost put the two together. And others later finished the job. The line, "Elementary my dear Watson" probably became famous when the talkies came in - it was used in The Return of Sherlock Holmes in 1929, which starred Clive Brook.
464 gray line
The other great 'Sherlock Holmes' actors
Benedict Cumberbatch as Sherlock Holmes
  • Basil Rathbone (1892-1967): English actor who played Holmes in 14 films between 1939 and 1946, still probably the most well-known screen incarnation of the role; Rathbone's films were the first to update Holmes and portray him pitting his wits against the Nazis
  • Jeremy Brett (1933-95): Starred in four series of Granada TV's The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, an attempt to adapt Conan Doyle's stories faithfully for television
  • Benedict Cumberbatch (1976-): Star of BBC's Sherlock (pictured), which re-imagines Holmes and Dr Watson in 21st Century London
464 gray line
Suave dressing gown
Conan Doyle describes Holmes' dressing gown as variously blue, purple or mouse-coloured, according to Roger Johnson, editor of the Sherlock Holmes Journal. However, that's all the reader is told.
Johnson says Gillette's dressing gown moved Holmes slightly up-market: "Gillette had a really rather plush, splendid dressing gown and some of the subsequent actors adopted similar ones."
William Gillette as Sherlock HolmesWilliam Gillette portrayed with dressing gown (and curved pipe)
Before Gillette, Holmes inhabited, if not a seedy world, then a dangerous one. He employed a reformed crook as one of his assistants. The luxuriant dressing gown is part of a more louche, languid Holmes who may inject cocaine on stage but mixes with a more high society crowd.
Paget had drawn the dressing gown as "slightly ragged", says Werner. "When Gillette took on the role the dressing gown was very glamorous, he is quite the suave bachelor. It's the key costume," says Werner.
Years later, Conan Doyle gave Eille Norword, another actor to play Holmes, a vividly patterned dressing gown, perhaps inspired by Gillette's version.
Cumberbatch has made the dark grey, double-breasted Belstaff Milford part of his look. But he continues the tradition of lounging around in a dressing gown. His most commonly used robe is pure silk, navy-coloured with a satin stripe.
He shaped America's view of Holmes
Gillette was the first American stage actor to take on this most English of roles. His delivery mixed an upper crust English accent with North American twang.
"You can hear the same sort of thing when Katharine Hepburn tries to speak in an English way in The African Queen," says Johnson.
Gillette's 1916 silent film, though set in London, was shot in the US. He also brought an American influence to Holmes's appearance.
In a previous play, Secret Service, there was something of the matinee idol about him. His Holmes contrasted with the prominent nose and cheekbones of a Basil Rathbone, Douglas Wilmur or Benedict Cumberbatch.
Recording of William Gillette in his dramatic adaptation "Sherlock Holmes"
Compared to the Holmes of the time, his was "less gaunt and beaky, with more hair," says Johnson. "And more handsome."
At the start of the 20th Century, the American illustrator Frederic Dorr Steele drew Holmes for various US publications. His model was Gillette.
"That's what most Americans saw Holmes as. Whereas in Britain it was the illustrations of [Sidney] Paget in the Strand magazine," Johnson says.
And his reputation continued to grow. Calm and charismatic, is how silent film buffs describe him. Few have seen the 1916 film but even the photos show how naturally he took to the role, says Johnson. "He's marvellous. People say he is Sherlock Holmes."
Gillette was king of the silent movie age but when the talkies arrived, it was time for another kind of Holmes to emerge. For many fans today, it is Rathbone who became and remains the archetype.
He helped inspire Conan Doyle to 'reboot' Holmes
Conan Doyle killed off Holmes in print in 1893. A stage adaptation he wrote failed to get off the ground, which might explain his willingness to allow Gillette to write his own.
When the American asked whether the script could see Holmes married, Conan Doyle replied: "You may marry him, murder him, or do what you like to him."
He seemed to trust Gillette implicitly, says Werner. They'd hit it off as soon as they met. According to Charles Higham's biography, Gillette alighted from a train dressed as Holmes before approaching Conan Doyle's carriage and examining him through a magnifying glass.
New York theatre programme advertising Gillette's performanceA New York theatre programme advertising Gillette
"Unquestionably an author," he announced, to Conan Doyle's amusement.
But there was another factor beside friendship - money.
"I believe however that there is a fortune in the other - Sherlock Holmes," Conan Doyle writes in a letter dated 18 June 1899. "Gillette has made a great play out of it, and he is a great actor."
He believed it was destined to be a hit. Royalties would have been the primary motivation but there was also a sense that it might create a new interest in reading the books. "It has such an enormous initial advertisement," the letter continued. "I am not usually over sanguine but I do have great hopes for this. It is our trump card."
Conan Doyle began writing The Hound of the Baskervilles while the play was on. Did the drama subtly influence the way Conan Doyle wrote the later stories? Johnson thinks not: "Some people say the character in the later stories is not the same but I can't detect any change."
Whatever the aesthetic impact, Gillette's success - this "trump card" - would have reassured Conan Doyle that there was still a public appetite for Holmes.
As he wrote when he first read Gillette's stage adaptation: "It's good to see the old chap back."
464 gray line

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

A rather quick survey. . . .

It has been said that Basil Rathbone loathed the fact that he was primarily known as the actor who played Sherlock Holmes to the greater public. Disappointed that some of his better works were not the reason he was best remembered.
We, as Sherlockians, know of Basil Rathbone's other works, as I am sure do most film historians.
But probably not the general public, if they know him, now, at all.

I did a quick check, using the list on wikipedia, to see how many actors who have played Sherlock Holmes over the years, were introduced as 'being best known as playing Sherlock Holmes' or some wording close to that, within the first one or two introductory paragraphs.

It is surprising, out of that list of well over fifty, how few actors are first introduced as 'being best known as playing Sherlock Holmes.'

Of the rest, many are great actors who are known for other rolls.
Others are actors not all that well known for anything memorable.

Now the question I have is: As an actor, would you want that to be your claim to fame, 'the actor best known for playing Sherlock Holmes'? Is that how you want to best be remembered? Or is it something you come to accept?
Does being remembered as such usually mean your performance as Holmes is accepted as an accurate or note worthy adaptation of the original?

Most of the ones that do share that claim to fame are ones that are still discussed as some of the best Sherlock Holmes portrayals seen on film.

Interestingly, at least for me, of all the actors, the only one I really have any knowledge of other notable film rolls happens to be Rathbone. All the others on the list I would have to research their other rolls.

Here is the ones I was able to pick out as being introduce as 'an actor now known best for his portrayal of Sherlock Holmes'. The list was done quickly, so may not be totally complete, but I think it is fairly close.

Jeremy Brett - not publicly known for other major film works
Nicholas Rowe - not publicly know for other major film works
Douglas Wilmer - in the 50's and 60's known for other works perhaps, but remembered as Holmes
Arthur Wontner - not known for other works
William Gillette - to long ago for most to know him for anything else (but was a major contributor to the world of Sherlock Holmes on stage and film.)
Ellie Norwood - again, maybe to long ago, but now best known as Holmes
Hugo Flink - Austrian actor known as one of the earliest actors to play Sherlock Holmes
Basil Rathbone -

Vasily Livanov - it is noted that his greatest success came at playing Holmes, but he is not introduced, yet, that way.

I have only hard that Nigel Bruce never regretted his association with one of Doyle's characters, but I have never heard of a Holmes actor that felt the same way. Although I get the feeling Douglas Wilmer may feel that way now. But did he as a younger actor.
Rathbone seemed to embrace the association later in life. But I get the feeling it felt like a burden for many years.

I don't think it will happen with the three current actors portraying Sherlock Holmes. Is that because their other work is better than their Holmes work?  Or is because their Holmes aren't that good?


Friday, June 28, 2013

If you happen to make this thespian pilgrimage . . . .

The Middletown Press announced that Gillette Castle will offer free outdoor performances this summer - in particular “on July 6 and running until Aug. 11, "Sherlock Holmes and the Speckled Band" takes the outdoor stage." For more information on this free adaptation of Gillette’s dramatized version of “The Speckled Band", see East Haddam Stage Company. For those unfamiliar, Gillette Castle, situated on the banks of the Connecticut River, was commissioned and designed by early 20th century actor William Gillette who of course played the role of the master sleuth in Sherlock Holmes (penned by Gillette himself) onstage starting in 1899 more than 1,300 times over a thirty year period. I’ve always felt that the power and influence of seeing Gillette don the role of Holmes was best articulated by Booth Tarkington (Pulitzer Prize-winning author) who told Gillette, “I would rather see you play Sherlock Holmes than be a child again on Christmas morning." The legendary actor and Holmes aficionado resided at Gillette Castle until his death in 1937.


Thanks 1895!

Gillette Castle

Tuesday, June 25, 2013

Seven Degrees of Sherlock Holmes - #9 - Charlie Chaplin (or is it really Geraldine Chaplin? or is it really Raquel Welch?)

OK, this week I picked, for me, a fairly easy one (I already knew one of the answers), but none-the-less a fun one, with some interesting facts. (Any good Sherlockian I am sure already knows this stuff, right?)
So here goes.

Sir Charlie Chapline - 1889-1977


Starting in 1903 he toured with H.A.Saintsbury - 1869


in Charles Frohmans' 1903 production of  - 


'Sherlock Holmes' - 

(This is a poster of Cecil Barth production with H.A.Saintsbury in it.)

Where Charlie Chaplin played Billy the page boy - 


Which lead to Charlie again playing Billy with the famous William Gillette 



Chaplin would tour in the roll of Billy the pageboy for almost two and a half years.

Now this is a pretty easy connection for one of the greatest actors of anyone's time.
But it doesn't stop here. (Although maybe it should)

In 1943 Charlie married Oona O'Neill 


In 1944 they had a daughter, Geraldine Chaplin - 


who went on to star in the 1973 (one of my all time favorite films) adaption of 'The Three Musketeers'


Which also starred Charlton Heston 


Who's Sherlock Holmes connection we made in Seven Degrees of Sherlock Holmes number 8


But we could really skip the Charlton Heston connection because she is related to Billy the page boy.
(But that wouldn't be any fun.)

But the Three Musketeers connection also allows me to post pictures of one on my childhood favorites, and her connection to Sherlock Holmes.

Raquel Welch 


(I like her for her acting, really!)

Who also starred in the 1973 film (with, once again, Charlton Heston)


as Constance Bonacieux -  


(If there is demand, I may have to do the Raquel Welch connection again down the road.)




It seems, so far, we just can't get very far away from Sherlock Holmes.

Have a great day.